Ieskau Stake 2.20$/180 SnG

Sveiki,

Ieskau Stake zaisti 2.20$ 180 zmoniu SNG PokerStars'uose. Jei ka domina butu gerai kokiems 1K geimu minimum laikotarpis butu jau sutartinis.

Vienu metu zaidziu apie 15 - 20 stalu,

Statistika is SC

vedukas 3,272 $0 $2 6% $409

CIa alltaimas, tik 2.20,

Su steiku butu gerai ir bent min couchas kad nebutu tu svingu dideliu.

Jeik a rasykit i foruma arba i asmenini.

Nemanau, kad su tokia statistika kas nors tave sumanys steikinti

Tai va kad pliusuoti galiu, tik gal sakau kazko man truksta nes SC grafikas tai jau vingiuojasi tai ne tas zodis, tik va mastau kaip ji istiesinti kad daugiau kiltu i virsu...

Visiškai nebeatini šio limito, manau laikas ieškotis kur tavo edge ir laiméjimai bus žymiai geresni po tiekk turnyru...

SC paziiurek grafika tai toks keistas... bet pas mane bangom uzeina...

padauzyk 45 man

p.s. shark scope, o ne sharks cope

Cia mano dvoikes all taimo... o siaip rimciau pradejau zaisti nuo siu metu (2010) tai ant sharkscopo atsirusiavus matysis geeriau tai va ir bus viskas aiskiau...

manyciau ieskai pigiausio budo pasicochint ;D kuris tikrai brangiau kainuoja nei tavo 0.12$ nuo game

sakau cia all time statistika... p,s, bet siaip vis ne minusas...

o siaip mokytis gan paprasta.

Fundamentals

Rule of 10bb

EV

$EV

chipEV

Harrington's M

Gap concept

2-1 rule

Tight stack concept

180man Introduction

Prize structure

General approach

Player tendencies

Introduction to push/fold decisions

Hand ranges - assigning ranges, how to assign them, factors involved in hand

range assignment

Early/Middle Play

Starting hands

Reasoning behind strategies

EP Shoving

MP Shoving

LP Shoving

BvB shoving

Playing facing a raise

Playing facing a limper/limpers

How to play a big stack

How to play a short-stack

How to play a micro-stack

Re-shoving

Post-flop play, c-betting

Risk vs. Reward

Late stage

****Includes all topics from early/middle play

"Closing" Mode

Passing up +EV shoves

Bubble play

Post-bubble play

Short-handed play and implications

Conservative chipEV

Final table bubble

Final table

"Closing" Mode - further discussed, differences

Strategy adjustments

Creating fold-equity

$EV/ICM implications

Short-handed implications

How to play against various opponent styles once short-handed

Heads Up

Nash equilibrium

Exploitative vs. Unexploitative concept

Various HU styles

Adjusting to different styles

Push/fold rules

Playing when <15bb's

Playing when >15bb's

Re-shoving, Re-stealing

Game analysis

Using push/fold chart

Using SNGPT to analyze your game

How to review your games effectively

Na jei kazko is sito nezinai reikia tikrai smarkiai tobulet

siaip gal ir zinau bet is [parashymo nesupratau gap concept reiks pasigooglint

Na jei kazko is sito nezinai reikia tikrai smarkiai tobulet

esu tikras, kad nemokant nei puses tiek galima nesunkiai beatint $2 fielda

on the other hand - jokiu budu nevaikau nuo mokymosi.

As manau, kad tiek nemokant galima ir 12$ nesunkiai beatint

Tai JOuKERis ir nerašė, kad negalima beatint, o kad yra kur tobulėt.

Na buvo parasyta "jei kazko is sito nezinai..." Abejoju, ar isvis cia yra toks kuris viska moka cia. Tad visiem yra kur tobulet Is to isplaukia, kad pats teiginys yra nesamoningas